Alexis Blokhina vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 01:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Blokhina vs A. Vrancken Peeters

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Blokhina 1 - 0 Peeters
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alexis Blokhina winning 2 and Anouck Vrancken Peeters winning 0. The last match between Alexis Blokhina and Anouck Vrancken Peeters was at the W50 Troisdorf, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Alexis Blokhina getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Blokhina | 1 |
| Peeters | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Troisdorf(06-04-25)
A. Blokhina vs A. V. Peeters H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.74% (71-44) | Career Total W/L | 60.35% (137-90) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
A. Blokhina vs A. V. Peeters Match Preview:
- When it comes to second serve points, Blokhina edges slightly ahead, securing 40.19% of points compared to Peeters' 39.51%. Could this small difference influence the outcome?
- An analysis of return games reveals Peeters as more effective, winning 49.75% of opponents' second serve points and 36.98% of first serve return points, while Blokhina wins 44.83% and 35.52% respectively. Does this suggest Peeters might dominate the return games?
- Under pressure, Blokhina marginally outperforms Peeters by saving 48.79% of breakpoints as opposed to 47.59%. Could this indicate composure in crucial moments?
- In terms of overall performance over the past year, Peeters shows a slight lead with a 70.18% win rate compared to Blokhina's 69.05%.
- Both players have their highest win rates on indoor hard courts; however, Peeters boasts a more impressive 81%, while Blokhina has achieved 60%.
- When facing stronger opponents, Blokhina has played against higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 393.07 versus Peeters’ 429.39. Does this expose her to tougher competition?
- In deciding sets, Blokhina has a superior win rate, clinching 75% compared to Peeters' 65%. Could this indicate an edge in tightly contested matches?
- Peeters excels in converting breakpoint opportunities, achieving 43.87%, a notable advantage over Blokhina's 37.24%.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match looms, Peeters displays slightly stronger performance in several key areas. Her ability to convert breakpoints more effectively and win a significant portion of opponents’ second serve returns makes her a formidable contender.
Blokhina, however, demonstrates an ability to thrive in closely contested matches, evidenced by her higher percentage of wins in deciding sets and a consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents.
Both players have showcased their strengths on indoor hard courts, but Peeters' more dominant win rate suggests she might hold a small advantage on this surface.
Overall, while both players have their merits, Peeters appears to have a slight edge in performance metrics, hinting at her potential to win this closely matched encounter.
Alexis Blokhina vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Blokhina vs A. V. Peeters H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:14:41 | Average Match Time | 2:14:41 |
| 64% (48/75) | 1st Serve % | 78% (71/91) |
| 63% (30/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (33/71) |
| 48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
| 51% (46/91) | Return Points Win % | 43% (32/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Blokhina Recent Matches Played
A. V. Peeters Recent Matches Played

A. Blokhina vs A. V. Peeters Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.74% (71/44) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.35% (137/90) |
| 56.47% (144/111) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.98% (305/221) |
| 52.34% (1199/1092) | Games Win/Loss | 54.04% (2602/2213) |
| 62.00% (31/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.27% (44/29) |
| 62.71% (37/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.21% (58/51) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 79.55% (35/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 107 | Aces Total | 154 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.44 |
| 209 | Total Double Faults | 1042 |
| 1:29:39 | Average Match Time | 1:39:38 |
| 428.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 424.67 |
| 66% (4431/6748) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8748/13841) |
| 58% (2592/4431) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (5192/8748) |
| 48% (1109/2317) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2233/5093) |
| 51% (434/858) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (959/1862) |
| 46% (3181/6884) | Return Points Win % | 49% (6640/13649) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 62.11% (59/36) | Challenger W/L | 56.99% (53/40) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Futures W/L | 63.16% (84/49) |
| 61% (67/110) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (136/225) |
| 64% (14/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (18/40) |
| 80% (24/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (42/74) |
| 95% (66/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (124/109) |
| 5% (66/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (124/15) |
| 14% (49/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (103/27) |